top of page
Writer's pictureAlex Sternberg

Kahane-bashers can’t explain Kahanism!

Updated: Nov 12

Billy Joel famously wrote in his song, “It’s still Rock and Roll to me” But

you can’t get the sound from a story in a magazine...aimed at your average

teen.


I feel the same when some people attempt to explain Rabbi Meir Kahane

and his philosophy. Most of these pundits never met him, know little about

him and yet have the hutzpah to try to define him. The truth is Kahane was

a great leader who inspired a generation of young Jews. Today he is

inspiring a new generation, and this scares those on the left. Lots of young

Jews both religious and secular are flocking to embrace Kahane’s ideology.


Although the Brooklyn-born Rabbi was assassinated by an Arab terrorist in

1990, his legacy and ideology continue to gain in popularity. Recently, the

head of a far-right party in Israel, Otzma Yehudit (Jewish Strength) Itamar

Ben Gvir was elected to the Knesset garnering 14 seats in the next Israeli

Parliament. Ben Gvir, an unabashed follower of the late Rabbi, is slated to

become the minister of Internal Security in Israel. The left of center in

Israel is working up a lather trying to discredit both Ben Gvir and Kahane.


Kahane bashing is fast becoming a cottage industry. New books, purporting

to explain Kahane’s ideology are aimed at those who never heard of him

and are written by those who never knew him. It’s the veritable “blind

leading the blind”. One, a self-described “radical, left wing, socialists”

recently attempted to define Kahane. Kahane, of course, was a right-wing

anti-communist, who’s ideology was anathema to the writers’ socialist

views. Could this book be accurate, I wondered? When I read it, I was

amazed at the incredible dishonesty of the author, a Dartmouth professor

no less, who had the self-delusion to think that he could explain Kahane.

In fact, he never understood Kahane’s philosophy, and neither will anyone

who makes the mistake of buying his book.


More recently, I was sent a podcast by Daniel Gordis of his interview with

Yossi Klein Halevi. Yossi opined about the legacy of Kahane and his

opinion on the election of Itamar Ben Gvir, the right wing Kahanist.

Gordis prodded Yossi, a one-time follower of Meir Kahane to describe his

switch from being an ardent Kahane follower into a vocal Kahane basher.

Yossi explained that, with time, he became disenchanted and turned

against his onetime mentor.


I know Yossi since the late 60s when he was one of the boys I trained and

led in demonstrations to free Soviet Jewry. Yossi and I are good friends

and I admire his work of the past 50 years. (I also admire Daniel Gordis for

his intellect and insight) But Yossi and I came away from our involvement

with Meir Kahane with very different impressions. Ten years ago, Yossi did

not express the hostility and resentment of Kahane (dare I say hatred?)

that he does today. A once card carrying right-winger, he seems to have

shifted toward the left, toward the center. Naturally, Yossi is entitled to his

opinion and as a famous and well received author, he is probably better off

on his perch in the middle. I can however point out, that he was younger

than many of us from those old days who do not share his negative

opinions about Meir. Who knows if he had he been a bit older, he might

have understood Kahane better.


The truth is, that Meir was all about Ahavat Yisrael or love of Jews. This

was his guiding principle when in Brooklyn with the JDL and in Israel with

Kach. Ben Gvir is right about that. But Yossi is also right that Kahane

changed after making Aliyah. Yossi admits that he himself also changed.

Kahane became embittered at the situation he found in Israel. For sure, he

was a complex individual. I wonder, however, what gives Yossi the right to

change his perspective, the same right that he denies to Meir Kahane?


Kahane was a risk taker at a time when most Jewish leaders weren’t. He

was the guy at the roulette wheel, who after winning a hand, says, “let it

ride”. Many well-meaning rabbis encouraged him to moderate his views.

They assured him he would be more successful if he did. He could sell

more of his books. He would receive lucrative speaking engagements for

big bucks. But that was not Meir Kahane. As he would not betray his ideals,

so instead he stayed the course and said “let it ride”. Many in the

establishment were afraid of him. They neither had his courage nor his

fearlessness. His enthusiasm was contagious. We were all affected by it.

Undoubtedly, this was one of his strengths as a leader.


As I remember, thousands of Jews stood just a bit taller because of Kahane

and the JDL. I dare say that Yossi Klein Halevi was one of them!


Kahane’s words inspired a generation. His speeches touched a nerve in all

who heard him. Speech after speech, I saw him electrify the audience: “do

not stand idly by your brother’s blood”. For those of us whose parents were

survivors, this resonated. Where were the Jewish leaders in 1944 when my

brother was gassed in Auschwitz? Who stood up for my family? Or for

Yossi’s, for that matter.


Kahane was a leader who led from the front of the barricades, not from the

back lines. I was with him in Harlem when we confronted the Black

Panthers for their anti-Semitism. He stood next to me on the front line. He

was also there when we confronted the Nazis. He led by example.


He sacrificed much for his beliefs. His position as a pulpit Rabbi, as the

editor of the Jewish Press and his opportunity to be with his beloved

family. And as much as we travelled around the country, he was adamant

every week to get home for Shabbos to be with his wife and children.

Ultimately, he sacrificed his life for his beliefs.


When he arrived in Israel he recognized the danger that is only now

becoming apparent to so many. Can we allow the Arabs to vote the Jewish

soul and character out of the Jewish State? He wasn’t a racist and did not

hate Arabs. He just wanted to guarantee the ‘Jewishness’ of the State of

Israel.


So, he warned of the dangers of a large Arab fifth column rebelling against

the Jewish citizens of Israel. He was one of the early voices to sound that

alarm. Because so many today agree, Ben Gvir, is in the Knesset. But in the

70’s and 80’s he was considered an ‘outsider’ by the political establishment

and viewed with suspicion and alarm. That was why they turned against

him and shut him down. Not because of his ideology. Others in Likud held

similar views. They were not deemed” racist” and banned from running for

the Knesset. Ask yourselves had not his warnings come to pass? Doesn’t a

growing segment of the Israeli population today agree with him?


Furthermore, there are some in Israel advocating a radical leftwing

defeatist ideology that would lead to Israel’s destruction. They advocate

against the Jewishness of the State. And yet, they are not deemed racist

and banned from holding public office. Why the double standard?


I realize that as the views of Rabbi Meir Kahane resonates more with the

public, there is bound to be increased scrutiny about who he was and what

he stood for. Obviously, I am gratified at this. But I am saddened to hear

only the anti Kahane voices included in such debates.


I sincerely hope that there will be more future debates and podcasts

discussing Kahanism. Kahane deserves to have his philosophy debated and

explained. I jus hope that such a discourse will be conducted in an

atmosphere of honesty and fairness and include people who believe in

Kahane’s ideology and not be limited only to the Kahane bashers who

hated him.

0 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page